Template:1clw user comments
From PDBWiki
Use this page to add annotation for PDB entry: 1clw (click to see the user comments in the context of the original page)
Contents |
[edit] Instructions for adding user annotation
- Click the edit button above to view the page source (right click to show the source in a new tab/window)
- Find the line <!-- add user comments above -->
- Enter your comment directly above that line or below an existing comment you want to reply to
- Start a short comment (one or two sentences) with a '* ' (asterisk and space) to create a bullet point: e.g. * My comment
- To follow up on a previous comment, start your line with two (or more for further followups) asterisks (see example below)
- Start a long comment with a header line included in triple equal signs: e.g. ===My heading===
- To follow up on a long comment, use an informative header line, e.g. ===Re: My heading===
- When done, click Save page at the bottom of the page or Cancel to cancel (and loose all changes).
- To correct or delete the new comment simply edit the page again
- Click on the pdb code above to see the original page with your new comment
Note: Every structure also has a discussion page which you can use for questions and discussions regarding the structure or contributed user comments
Example:
<!-- enter user comments below --> * Someone elses comment ** My reply to someone elses comment *** Another reply to my reply ===My long comment=== My text ===Re: My long comment=== Someones reply to my text <!-- enter user comments above -->
[edit] User comments
[edit] Likely to be a trimer
The PISA server (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/msd-srv/prot_int/pistart.html) predicts this structure to be trimer which seems more likely than the monomeric PDB biounit.
[edit] Inconsistent mmCIF residue numbering
There is a chain break of 13.7A between the C-alpha atoms of residues 507 and 513 (395 and 396 in mmCIF residue numbering). The mmCIF numbering, which is supposed to match the SEQRES numbering, is inconsistent in this case.
