Template:1krq user comments
From PDBWiki
Use this page to add annotation for PDB entry: 1krq (click to see the user comments in the context of the original page)
Contents |
[edit] Instructions for adding user annotation
- Click the edit button above to view the page source (right click to show the source in a new tab/window)
- Find the line <!-- add user comments above -->
- Enter your comment directly above that line or below an existing comment you want to reply to
- Start a short comment (one or two sentences) with a '* ' (asterisk and space) to create a bullet point: e.g. * My comment
- To follow up on a previous comment, start your line with two (or more for further followups) asterisks (see example below)
- Start a long comment with a header line included in triple equal signs: e.g. ===My heading===
- To follow up on a long comment, use an informative header line, e.g. ===Re: My heading===
- When done, click Save page at the bottom of the page or Cancel to cancel (and loose all changes).
- To correct or delete the new comment simply edit the page again
- Click on the pdb code above to see the original page with your new comment
Note: Every structure also has a discussion page which you can use for questions and discussions regarding the structure or contributed user comments
Example:
<!-- enter user comments below --> * Someone elses comment ** My reply to someone elses comment *** Another reply to my reply ===My long comment=== My text ===Re: My long comment=== Someones reply to my text <!-- enter user comments above -->
[edit] User comments
[edit] BioUnit Error
Wow! The biological unit that has been deposited for this structure is really amazing! I wonder what keeps the subunits arranged in space in this way? Lets call it the 'error force'!
[edit] Reply
Who are these people who write the above? The PDB is absolutely correct in a 24 meric spherical sructure READ the UniProt entry - "SUBUNIT: Homo-oligomer of 24 subunits that assemble into a spherical protein shell " this PDB wiki appears to be full of ignorant comments by people who arfe incapable of understanding biology
- Who are these people who write the above? The BioUnit is absolutely incorrect, resulting from an error in the bounding box of the ASU in the BioUnit division of the PDB archive. LOOK at the structure of the BioUnit. The argument here isn't related to the fact that this protein functions as a 24-mer, but rather that the specific 24-mer presented in the BioUnit is totally insane!!! You can see the correct version of this protein in PISA, or in 1eum, for example. Also, please cite the 'ignorant comments' if you want to complain about them. The person seems incapable of understanding the scientific method.
